RE — One-Family Residential Estate
Buildings may cover at most 25 percent of the lot. Accessory buildings count toward coverage (§ 138-13.101).
What the Rochester Hills zoning ordinance says about lot coverage, district by district. Section numbers link to the official ordinance.
Buildings may cover at most 25 percent of the lot. Accessory buildings count toward coverage (§ 138-13.101).
Buildings may cover at most 25 percent of the lot. Accessory buildings count toward coverage (§ 138-13.101).
Buildings may cover at most 25 percent of the lot. Accessory buildings count toward coverage (§ 138-13.101).
Buildings may cover at most 30 percent of the lot. Accessory buildings count toward coverage (§ 138-13.101).
Buildings may cover at most 30 percent of the lot. Accessory buildings count toward coverage (§ 138-13.101).
Buildings may cover at most 50 percent of the lot.
R-3 bulk requirements apply through § 138-6.207, including the 30% maximum building coverage in Table 6. Accessory buildings count, subject to the specific roof/open-structure exceptions in § 138-10.100.D. The cluster chapter does not create a different coverage percentage.
No district-wide numeric maximum building-coverage percentage is stated in Article 6 Chapter 1, to which Table 6 refers. Lot area/density, yards, building separation, parking and recreation requirements still constrain development. Section 138-6.104.H requires recreation area of at least 5% of gross development area, with each recreation area at least 5,000 square feet. This is not a 95% building-coverage allowance.
No district-wide maximum building-coverage percentage is stated in Article 6 Chapter 4. Home-site area, building separation, streets and recreation constrain development. Parks with at least 50 sites require open space at least 2% of gross site area or 25,000 square feet, whichever is greater; perimeter buffers do not count. Do not infer a coverage percentage from that open-space requirement or import R-1 coverage from the height-only cross-reference.
Article 6 Chapter 5 does not set a separate maximum building-coverage percentage. Section 138-6.505 requires formal or active open space of at least 5% of gross lot area; it does not authorize 95% building coverage. Density, yards, site plan and other applicable standards remain in force.
Table 7 and its footnotes do not state a district-wide numeric maximum building-coverage percentage for NB. Setbacks, use-specific standards, parking, landscaping and site-plan requirements still limit the buildable area. Absence of a single percentage is not unlimited development.
Table 7 and its footnotes do not state a district-wide numeric maximum building-coverage percentage for CB. Setbacks, use-specific standards, parking, landscaping and site-plan requirements still limit the buildable area. Absence of a single percentage is not unlimited development.
Table 7 and its footnotes do not state a district-wide numeric maximum building-coverage percentage for HB. Setbacks, use-specific standards, parking, landscaping and site-plan requirements still limit the buildable area. Absence of a single percentage is not unlimited development.
Article 8 does not state a uniform maximum building-coverage percentage. Section 138-8.102.B retains other applicable ordinance standards for matters not addressed by the overlay. Places of interest must total at least 5% of gross floor area, not lot area, with at least two elements including one serving the public. This is not a 95% coverage allowance. Build-to, setback, parking and design controls remain applicable.
Maximum building coverage is 80% of the lot.
Table 7 and its footnotes do not state a district-wide numeric maximum building-coverage percentage for O. Setbacks, use-specific standards, parking, landscaping and site-plan requirements still limit the buildable area. Absence of a single percentage is not unlimited development.
Table 7 and its footnotes do not state a district-wide numeric maximum building-coverage percentage for I. Setbacks, use-specific standards, parking, landscaping and site-plan requirements still limit the buildable area. Absence of a single percentage is not unlimited development.
Table 7 and its footnotes do not state a district-wide numeric maximum building-coverage percentage for SP. Setbacks, use-specific standards, parking, landscaping and site-plan requirements still limit the buildable area. Absence of a single percentage is not unlimited development.
Table 7 and its footnotes do not state a district-wide numeric maximum building-coverage percentage for EC. Setbacks, use-specific standards, parking, landscaping and site-plan requirements still limit the buildable area. Absence of a single percentage is not unlimited development.
$49/month. An email when a human-reviewed rule change is published for Rochester Hills — with the citation, the date, and a link to the updated page. Quiet months get a short note confirming we checked. Cancel any time.
Alerts come only from reviewed changes, never from raw ordinance-site noise. Billing via Stripe; unsubscribe and cancellation links in every email.
Enter an address. We identify the zoning district and assemble what the ordinance says about it: permitted uses, dimensional rules, accessory structures, and the approval process.
District identification is free. The full brief is $79.